Compute and Storage Separated


Modern datacenters are getting more and more virtualized these days. Storage systems, being the essential part of a virtualized environment, are keeping the pace by evolving to the hyper-converged architecture. Nevertheless, hyper-converged architecture and “compute and storage separated” designs do coexist, since they are not mutually exclusive concepts and solve slightly different tasks.

Hyper-Converged architecture is not a good match for some scenarios and there are definite cases when compute and storage layers separated work better since scaling the hyper-converged clusters means upgrading compute and storage hardware parameters both simultaneously. Let’s clarify on that.
Virtualized environments assume expansions in two dimensions:
  • Compute resources (CPU, RAM, etc)
  • Storage resources (IOPS, capacity)
In hyper-converged systems each host is running compute and storage layers on the same hardware at the same time. Consequently, increasing of one dimension assumes increasing of the other one as well, and the problem here is that increasing of the second dimension may be not required. As a result, the money is paid for the hardware resources that are not used.
It’s expensive to upgrade compute and storage simultaneously every time
StarWind Virtual SAN supports both hyper-converged and compute and storage separated architectures. While running compute and storage layers apart from each other, it is possible to scale compute and storage resources independently, with different leverages regardless from each other. As a result, the system better fits the task while CapEx and OpEx go through the floor, since there is no need to purchase hardware that will be essentially wasted. Thus the system can be created specifically for a particular task.

When running StarWind in compute and storage separated scenarios where clusters are running out of compute power, all that is needed is to add to the hypervisor node more CPU and RAM, while the storage capacity and performance will remain the same. Likewise, if the system will be running out of storage IOPS or TBs, that dimension can be upgraded easily without affecting the compute power by adding storage node now.
Upgrading compute and storage resources independently from each other is cost-efficient

Running StarWind as the storage layer separately from the compute layer allows significant decrease of the CapEx and OpEx by allowing only those hardware resources to be installed into the storage system that are required for sure. Also, this scenario makes system hardware to better fit the task by allowing to manage compute and storage resources by pulling the different leverages.

For download, please make your selection below. An installer link and a license key will be sent to your e-mail. In case you’re not sure in your choice, please consult the following document Free vs. Paid. Current (V8) build is 11404 - Release Note.

A 2-node hyperconverged version of StarWind VSAN Free is available for certain use cases. Find the details here.

Related Materials
Request a Callback