Hello back, I actually typed a long reply, but forum setting actually timed you out and when it asked you to relogin, you lost everything you typed
To make it simple, when both primary and partner were connected= slow. If only just one target, let it be the primary or the partner, the speed = fast.
MPIO policy I did play with that, I went from round robine to least queued and back. My speed with MPIO is good, not sure how that's causing this problem?
Sync channel. Yes, I have it teamed, benchamrked and NTttcp speed was decent, 970Mbs ish if I remembered correctly. I would like to know what role does the sync channel play in my problem.
In my understanding, the sync channel is there to sync the two targets.
So today, if I only have CSV mounted, does that mean it is not syncing data over to CSVPartner ?
Also Anatoly, with your test scenario, that's exactly what I am doing right now, am I missing something ?
I only have the primary CSV target mounted, and everything is good. I can have CSVPartner mounted only, and speed is good. Now I have both mounted, speed went to crap, is your test going to validate something ? Because if it's hardware within one of the server, then I would have a problem when I mounted only either one of the target isn't it ? But I am not, both targets if mounted individually and separately they work flawlessly, it's only when both target were mounted the same time to create the HA effect then I would get that slowness.