What issues did you have with our free VTL? Not the answers your looking for, but... We didn't buy it because after testing the free version of VTL, your support staff danced around answering my questions about if the paid version would fix some pain points the free version had. And after pressing f...

Guys we appreciate your feedback.

StarWind NVMe-oF initiator supports NVMe-over-TCP now so you don't need to have any RDMA NICs now. TCP flow won't make your CPUs happy, but you'll get the performance numbers you want right away.

Kasey009 wrote:buying expensive NICs right after purchasing a couple of flash drives is quite a big investment.

Hey! Is there anything features-wise you think StarWind is missing so far? Thanks!

spiceagent11 wrote:I wanted HA/replication a while ago, and the active-active SAN solution from Starwind made it possible to do in a fraction of the cost of most other solutions, with more features than most other producs provide.

Thank you Sir!

brettgardner wrote:I buy the software of StarWind because of its functionality and services. I want to say thanks to the team of StarWind to do this great work for us.

You're welcomed!

Guys you're welcomed!

Yes, it will. You'll have to use WS2016 or 2019 though as we don't test against and support WS2012 anymore. Server with SCSI card with Quantum Scalar 50 robotic tape library. Operating System is Hyper-V 2012 core. Install Starwind Tape Redirector on this server. Present tape library to VM on this se...

Did you resolve the issue so far? Was our support helpful?

Yes, there's a P2V mode within our V2V converter. https://www.starwindsoftware.com/v2v-help/PhysicalDisksandP2VScenario.html I have a remote physical server that I only have remote access to and I would like to create a virtual image of it to send to my datacenter in my office. Can it do this? And i...

SMB/CIFS called "network redirector" within Microsoft terminology for a reason: it's just a local application "talking" to file system via file system local APIs and it has network layer "injected" in between it and a remote client. Block protocols and their way to deal...

You can do that because in most modern operating systems storage stacks are "layer cake" of multiple drivers put on top of each other. On Windows Server example it's: <physical device> := <StorPort + miniport | monolithic SCSI port> <optional SCSI filters> <block device> := <class driver> ...

How's your progress?