StarWind Enterprise Server
Request a Quote
Feel free to contact us:
USA and LATAM:
1-617-449-7717
EMEA and APAC:
+44(0)2071936727
+44(0)2071936350
+33(0)977197857 (French)
+49-1715109103 (Germany)
Voice Mail:
1-866-790-2646
Email:
sales@starwindsoftware.com
 
 

Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

iSCSI Target for Microsoft Windows.

Moderators: anton (staff), Max (staff), Constantin (staff)

Re: Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

Postby anton (staff) » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:14 am

880 megabits per second is a moderate result for 1 NIC. So for now 1) turn all TCP stack optimizations OFF 2) Turn back to non-teamed configuration and try to squeeze 950-980 megabits from one NIC. Installing latest drivers and playing with Jumbo frame size (4K or 9K).

oxyi wrote:Image


Network speed went down through the teaming network adapter.

I did the TCPIP registry thing -

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters]
GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize = 0x01400000 (DWORD)
TcpWindowSize = 0x01400000 (DWORD)
Tcp1323Opts = 3 (DWORD)
SackOpts = 1 (DWORD

and

I have the Intel Pro/1000 PT QuadPort, and I have the teaming set on
IEEE 802.3ad Dyanmic Link Aggregation. Any thought? It just doesn't seem like I'd reach that 1.6GB speed..
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer, StarWind Software

Image
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands

Re: Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

Postby oxyi » Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:34 pm

Just reporting back.

The 880megabites per second is on teamed NIC card.

I did turn off all TCP stack optimization, un-teamed the NIC, and installed latest driver and Jumbo frame size set at 4k. I was able to get about 930 megabites from a single NIC. But when I teamed them again, I am not even able to reach over 900 megabites at all. Any possible theory on that ?

Thanks!
oxyi
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:30 pm

Re: Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

Postby anton (staff) » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:44 pm

This means hardware vendor NIC teaming implementation just sucks... So for now please leave NICs as un-teamed and configure StarWind to use second NIC as alternative path. With upcoming V5.7 (1.5 - 2 months from now) we're going to represent our custom teaming for both performance and redundancy an solve this problem once and forever.

oxyi wrote:Just reporting back.

The 880megabites per second is on teamed NIC card.

I did turn off all TCP stack optimization, un-teamed the NIC, and installed latest driver and Jumbo frame size set at 4k. I was able to get about 930 megabites from a single NIC. But when I teamed them again, I am not even able to reach over 900 megabites at all. Any possible theory on that ?

Thanks!
Regards,
Anton Kolomyeytsev

Chief Technology Officer, StarWind Software

Image
User avatar
anton (staff)
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:03 am
Location: British Virgin Islands

Re: Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

Postby oxyi » Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:23 pm

Got it.

Two questions

Will snapshot function ever be implemented for HA?

Would you be able to send me the preset IOmeter configuration file for testing the 64kb access specification ? I am testing the RAM disk now.

Thanks.
oxyi
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:30 pm

Re: Recommendations for a Large SAN for Virtualization

Postby Max (staff) » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:45 am

Snapshots +HA are scheduled for 6.0
As for the IOmeter config file - drop us a letter to support@starwindsoftware.com and I will send you the appropriate icf file.
Max Kolomyeytsev
StarWind Software
User avatar
Max (staff)
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:03 am

Previous

Return to StarWind

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests